Research peer-reviewed articles that were published within the last 10 years

For this discipline-based literature review, you will research peer-reviewed articles that were published within the last 10 years in the Ashford University Library on the following major perspectives of personality.

Research peer-reviewed articles that were published within the last 10 years

For this discipline-based literature review, you will research peer-reviewed articles that were published within the last 10 years in the Ashford University Library on the following major perspectives of personality.

Psychodynamic
Behavioral
Trait
Learning/Social
Humanistic

You will utilize your researched article to create your literature review. The review should be formatted with the headings and content designated below.

Introduction
Assess the types of personality measurements and research designs used in in the peer-reviewed articles you researched. Briefly describe the main theoretical models represented within each of the perspectives of personality and explain the commonalities found across all five: (Psychodynamic, Behavioral, Trait, Learning/Social, and Humanistic)

Discussion
Examine the major theoretical approaches, research methods, and assessment instruments used in the five perspectives of personality (Psychodynamic, Behavioral, Trait, Learning/Social, and Humanistic).

Evaluate and describe the current research in these perspectives using a minimum of one peer-reviewed article for each of the five required perspectives (Psychodynamic, Behavioral, Trait, Learning/Social, and Humanistic).
Present a detailed critique of each of the perspectives by evaluating the standardization, reliability and validity, and cultural considerations present in the most common personality assessments used within each.

Support your opinions about each model by substantiating them with scholarly research.

Be sure to include the following:

The theoretical framework(s) for the selected models

The major contributors to those fields

The methods of inquiry and assessment usually associated with those models

An overview of the characteristics, strengths, and weaknesses of the models

Conclusion
Provide a summary of your evaluation addressing the current use and relevance of these perspectives in explaining personality citing research as appropriate.

Writing the Discipline Based Literature Review

The paper:

Must be seven to ten double-spaced pages in length and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Must include a title page with the following:
Firstly, Title of paper
Secondly, Your name
Thirdly, Course name and number
Fourthly, Your instructor’s name
Further, Date submitted
Additionally, Must begin with an introduction that describes and the main theoretical models represented within each of the perspectives of personality.
Moreover, Must address the topics of the paper with critical thought.
Also, Must end with a conclusion that summarizes your evaluation addressing the current use and relevance of these perspectives in explaining personality.
Furthermore, Must use at least five peer-reviewed sources from the Ashford University Library.
Besides, Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Finally, Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Grading Rubic:

Assesses the Types of Personality Measurements and Research Designs Used in the Peer-Reviewed Articles Researched
Distinguished -Thoroughly assesses the types of personality measurements and research designs used in the peer-reviewed articles researched.

Describes the Main Theoretical Models Represented Within each of the Perspectives of Personality and Explains the Commonalities Found Across all Five
Distinguished – Also, Describes the Main Theoretical Models Represented Within each of the Perspectives of Personality. Explains the Commonalities Found Across all Five.

Examines the Major Theoretical Approaches, Research Methods, and Assessment Instruments Used in the Five Perspectives of Personality
Distinguished – Thoroughly and accurately examines the major theoretical approaches, research methods, and assessment instruments used in the five perspectives of personality.

Evaluates and Describes the Current Research in the Perspectives Using a Minimum of One Peer-Reviewed Article for Each of the Five Required Perspectives Distinguished. Thoroughly evaluates and describes the current research in the perspectives using a minimum of one peer-reviewed article for each of the five required perspectives.

Presents a Critique of Each of the Perspectives by Evaluating the Standardization, Reliability and Validity. Also, Cultural Considerations Present in the Most Common Personality Assessments Used Within Each Distinguished. Presents an accurate and detailed critique of each of the perspectives by evaluating the standardization, reliability and validity, and cultural considerations present in the most common personality assessments used within each.

Supports Opinions About Each Model by Substantiating Them With Scholarly Research
Distinguished – Thoroughly supports opinions about each model by fully substantiating them with scholarly research.

Provides a Conclusion That Summarizes the Evaluation and Addresses the Current Use. Also, Relevance of These Perspectives in Explaining Personality Citing Research as Appropriate
Distinguished – Provides a comprehensive and accurate conclusion that thoroughly summarizes the evaluation and addresses the current use and relevance of these perspectives in explaining personality citing research as appropriate.

Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Posted in Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>